Going global: Choosing a competition payment gateway that works across borders by Lindsay Nash | May 26, 2026 | ArticlesGoing global with your competition is an exciting step. Getting your payment setup right from the start means your entrants spend their energy on submitting great work, and not wrestling with a checkout that won’t work for them in the end.
What reading glasses taught me about accessibility — and why Euler knew it first by Rachel Martin | May 19, 2026 | ArticlesAccessibility is not just for people with disabilities—it’s for everyone. Here’s a personal reflection on inclusive design, AI, and the unlikely genius who made it all possible.
The best awards management platform for international competitions: what to look for by Katia Ernst | May 18, 2026 | ArticlesRunning an international awards program takes more than a multilingual interface. The right awards management platform should support true localisation: from language-specific entry forms and judging workflows to local currencies, date formats and culturally appropriate communication.
Beyond the basics: Advanced features to look for in an awards entry form builder by Lindsay Nash | May 12, 2026 | ArticlesIf you’ve built an awards entry form before, you already know the fundamentals. But once you’ve run a cycle or two, basic form-building isn’t the challenge anymore. The challenge is extracting more: more quality from your entries, more efficiency from your process, more value and ROI from your awards platform.
How to anonymise judging data without losing the insights that matter by Katia Ernst | May 5, 2026 | ArticlesWithout a clear approach to anonymisation, even well-intentioned reporting can surface more than it should. Respecting data privacy and producing meaningful analysis are not in conflict. It simply comes down to how you handle the data.
ISMS explained: What an information security management system actually means for your organisation by Katia Ernst | Apr 28, 2026 | ArticlesOutstanding awards programs are defined by fairness, transparency and professionalism. All of that depends on participants, jury members and sponsors being able to trust that their data is handled securely and responsibly.